They will not be held accountable for anything they do when they meet in secret.
As is their past and practice, they will not make a recording of the in secret session. They will not because if a judge at some later time orders the record to be produced, it will produced against their interests.
The law allows them to meet and make decisions that affect our interests, in meetings in secret from us. The law does not prevent them from recording them.
All you have, to protect your interests, is their assurance that they will not violate the Open Meetings Act in any of its specific protection of your rights to know how your power and resources are being spent.
They have demonstrated their unworthiness of your trust.
At an audit committee meeting in August 2010, they made a decision in secret. The decision was not on their agenda and was not added to their closing statement. They all swore, by roll call vote, that they had discussed and decided no other issue.
Videotape evidence and sworn statements prove otherwise.
The record shows them breaking the law and then perjuring themselves.
You really don't know what will happen in this meeting. You really won't know how the board member who represents you at that meeting, performs. You have only to trust them behind closed doors.
 |
| You cannot trust them. They are manifestly untrustworthy. |
They are willing to break the law in order to continue to hide the findings of investigations of public corruption and incompetence in the leadership of the APS.
And not because the law requires them to,
but because the law allows them to.
The law, legal weaselry, and the Journal.
photo Mark Bralley
No comments:
Post a Comment