Logically, the consequences should reflect the circumstances, not the least of which is; is there a pattern of misconduct or was this a one-offer.
This is not his first rodeo. He is a named respondent in a number of ongoing lawsuits over alleged misogyny, bulling and anger management issues. He has been sued before. He has a record.
If the Journal does not investigate
and report upon Winston Brooks'
record; similar misconduct, similar
allegations and similar complaints,
including ongoing complaints and
litigation over allegations of his
ongoing misogyny and bullying,
as part of their coverage of this story,
it will be for one of two reasons;
1. some ethically defensible reason or,Something like ongoing complicity in a conspiracy to cover up the ethics and accountability scandal in the leadership of the APS.
2. some ethically indefensible reason.
photo Mark Bralley
No comments:
Post a Comment